I can't think of much to comment on this writing becasue I feel that is was like reading a chapter out of a textbook. In my opinion this was an example of the boring form of Academic Discourse. James Gee was very one minded, saying that his way seemed to be the only way for the research of Discourses. I thought that he was writing to an audience that very much appreciates the idea of breaking down Discourses into even more complex ideas. I just must not be one of those people. It was a personal struggle to finish this piece of writing but I did form a few opinoins about the concepts written.
I agree with the idea that there are primary and secondary discourses. I also agree that there can be conflict between the two. I, however, feel like theorems are too specific and one minded. For example in the second theorem, Gee says that all Primary Theorems are limited, no matter what. I think that even though that may be true for many, it can still be liberating for some. Even though he defends what he says by saying primary discourses still have tools to be liberating, I feel that he is over generalizing for all.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Saturday, March 6, 2010
The Human Cost of an Illiterate Society
There were 3 words that I would say were the underlying feelings of illiterate people that the author, Jonathan Kozol, was trying to portray: Confusion, Fear, and Distrust.
Throughout the story, the author tries to show how illiterate people are left in panic and confusion. They are not able to understand anything from a restaurant menu to medication instructions. I like how he relates how they feel to a dream he has had. "I find that I am in a railroad station of a large department store within a city that is utterly unknown to me and where I cannot understand the printed words." (204) I feel I wouldn't be able to read street signs or names of stores if I were somewhere like China, where they have different symbols. I feel that is the way I could relate to the struggles of an illiterate person. It has to be hard to go through life not being able to be independent, to read and write on my own. Not being able to understand or be independent would leave illiterate people in confusion.
It hit me hard when I got to the part with an interview of an illiterate person describing the fear they must live with everyday. The illiterate person describes the danger of being lost and the possibility of a family member getting hurt. Because they cannot read the street signs, by the time they figure out where they are to tell the 911 dispatcher, the family member could be dead. (204) When I was little, I had that fear when I didn't know my own address and to have that fear your whole life must be so hard.
A lot of the paragraphs dealing with having other people read letters, bills, and statements to them, had a lot of distrust be the illiterate people. They depend on others for these things, but there is no real way to find out if the people helping them aren't scamming them. "...you end up trusting no one and suspecting everyone of possible deceit." I think that kind or paranoia would add to even more stress in an illiterate person's life.
Side note- Over all I thought the information given, gave a true sense of the struggle that illiterate people go through daily. However, I thought it was a very boring read because it was in a list type of format and didn't add a lot of variety to the way the story was written.
Throughout the story, the author tries to show how illiterate people are left in panic and confusion. They are not able to understand anything from a restaurant menu to medication instructions. I like how he relates how they feel to a dream he has had. "I find that I am in a railroad station of a large department store within a city that is utterly unknown to me and where I cannot understand the printed words." (204) I feel I wouldn't be able to read street signs or names of stores if I were somewhere like China, where they have different symbols. I feel that is the way I could relate to the struggles of an illiterate person. It has to be hard to go through life not being able to be independent, to read and write on my own. Not being able to understand or be independent would leave illiterate people in confusion.
It hit me hard when I got to the part with an interview of an illiterate person describing the fear they must live with everyday. The illiterate person describes the danger of being lost and the possibility of a family member getting hurt. Because they cannot read the street signs, by the time they figure out where they are to tell the 911 dispatcher, the family member could be dead. (204) When I was little, I had that fear when I didn't know my own address and to have that fear your whole life must be so hard.
A lot of the paragraphs dealing with having other people read letters, bills, and statements to them, had a lot of distrust be the illiterate people. They depend on others for these things, but there is no real way to find out if the people helping them aren't scamming them. "...you end up trusting no one and suspecting everyone of possible deceit." I think that kind or paranoia would add to even more stress in an illiterate person's life.
Side note- Over all I thought the information given, gave a true sense of the struggle that illiterate people go through daily. However, I thought it was a very boring read because it was in a list type of format and didn't add a lot of variety to the way the story was written.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
The Ethnography of Literacy
This piece opened my eyes to something that I have never really thought of as an issue needing to be developed. I was shocked that I found such interest in the idea that what I might think, and what many might think is the definition of literacy and literature can be completely questioned.
The part that spoke to me the most was about when the author talked about what people are reading. I personally disclike reading... a lot, unless it is a magazine. I read them cover to cover and don't just look at the pictures. I love being able to relate to the stories and since they aren't long the keep my interest. When John Szwed commented that in lots of places that is considered a book, I thought that was crazy. I never thought of that as real reading becasue it isn't the kind of reading we are forced to read in school. It proved to me that I am still reading. Who is allowed to say what i am reading isn't as much of literacy as an encyclapedia?
From that point on in the story, I was realyy ingaged and loved how the author went one to talk about how literacy can be interpreted and the factors that can effect it. I never really thought about the fact that your social status, age, race, and more can effect your level of literacy.
The part that spoke to me the most was about when the author talked about what people are reading. I personally disclike reading... a lot, unless it is a magazine. I read them cover to cover and don't just look at the pictures. I love being able to relate to the stories and since they aren't long the keep my interest. When John Szwed commented that in lots of places that is considered a book, I thought that was crazy. I never thought of that as real reading becasue it isn't the kind of reading we are forced to read in school. It proved to me that I am still reading. Who is allowed to say what i am reading isn't as much of literacy as an encyclapedia?
From that point on in the story, I was realyy ingaged and loved how the author went one to talk about how literacy can be interpreted and the factors that can effect it. I never really thought about the fact that your social status, age, race, and more can effect your level of literacy.
Monday, February 15, 2010
Engaged Pedagogy
The main theme I came up with from the chapter of Bell Hooks' book was the desire for inspiration.
I think that the author is trying to say that in order to reach the point of self-actualization, one needs to feed off of the insiration the recieve from another. In this chapter, the inspiration discussed is a professor or teacher. I can really relate to part where Hooks says "Most of my professors were not the slightest bit interested in enlightenment. More than anything they seemed enthralled by the excersize of power and authority within their mini-kingdom, the classroom" (70). Even in my first semester of college, I had 4 of my 5 professors be completely disconnected with what they were talking about and had more fun pointing out kids that were using their cellphones. It is hard to get inspired about a topic or a certain problem if the one educating you on it doesn't care about it. There was however one professor who really inspired me to reach my full potential. Because he cared about me as a person and what he was trying to teach me, I, to this day, feel so inspired by him and feel am a better student because of him.
Also, Hooks goes onto say that there are a few teachers, however, that do inspire us and those are the ones that help us reach our goal of self- actualization. (70)Because I am going to be a teacher one day, I feel this opened my eyes. After reading this chapter, I now know how much harder I will have to work so that I can be one of the few teachers that in the end, does inspire students. I will never be the teacher just going to teach because it is their job. I am going to teach because I am inspired myself, by a few passionate teachers, to follow in their footsteps as inspirational leaders.
I think that the author is trying to say that in order to reach the point of self-actualization, one needs to feed off of the insiration the recieve from another. In this chapter, the inspiration discussed is a professor or teacher. I can really relate to part where Hooks says "Most of my professors were not the slightest bit interested in enlightenment. More than anything they seemed enthralled by the excersize of power and authority within their mini-kingdom, the classroom" (70). Even in my first semester of college, I had 4 of my 5 professors be completely disconnected with what they were talking about and had more fun pointing out kids that were using their cellphones. It is hard to get inspired about a topic or a certain problem if the one educating you on it doesn't care about it. There was however one professor who really inspired me to reach my full potential. Because he cared about me as a person and what he was trying to teach me, I, to this day, feel so inspired by him and feel am a better student because of him.
Also, Hooks goes onto say that there are a few teachers, however, that do inspire us and those are the ones that help us reach our goal of self- actualization. (70)Because I am going to be a teacher one day, I feel this opened my eyes. After reading this chapter, I now know how much harder I will have to work so that I can be one of the few teachers that in the end, does inspire students. I will never be the teacher just going to teach because it is their job. I am going to teach because I am inspired myself, by a few passionate teachers, to follow in their footsteps as inspirational leaders.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Inventing the University
After reading through this essay for the second time, I came to realize, I didn't understand ANY of it before. Reading it again slower and more focused I am now starting to put the pieces together. I am not a good speller nor good at finding out what words really mean. I realized how many words can mean multiple things. THe word that I think I am now understanding is "Commonplace." I know that after reviewing the term in class and now reading it over and over in the text I finally see that I was wrong in my first definition of it.
I now can see that when referring to commonplace, the author is referring to an already reviewed topic. I realized that it isnt about two people coming to an agreement or reaching a peaceful state of mind. I now know that this commonplace is a thought that isn't original. If I were to say, I think the sky is blue... that would be one of the most unoriginal statements I can make. Since the thought is mine but wasn't mine first, it is a commonplace. That is what I understand it to be. I am still learning about it and may still be confused but I think from my previous definitions, I am coming along to understanding the idea.
I now can see that when referring to commonplace, the author is referring to an already reviewed topic. I realized that it isnt about two people coming to an agreement or reaching a peaceful state of mind. I now know that this commonplace is a thought that isn't original. If I were to say, I think the sky is blue... that would be one of the most unoriginal statements I can make. Since the thought is mine but wasn't mine first, it is a commonplace. That is what I understand it to be. I am still learning about it and may still be confused but I think from my previous definitions, I am coming along to understanding the idea.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
A Kind Word for Bullshit
" For many non-academics, academic writing is not just bullshit but bullshit of the worst kind." (Eubanks p.381)
When reading the text, "A Kind Word for Bullshit," I couldn't relate to much of what the authors were saying. I could barely even understand what they were trying to say, until I came to this quote. I believe myself to not be a specialist of any kind in academic studies. I'm not majoring in any science fields and I do not plan to be a doctor one day. Although there are many other fields that use academic discourse, I still don't feel like I specialize in any of them. Therefore, I consider myself a non-academic, as referred to in the text.
As a non-academic, when reading a case study or an important document, I always think of ways they could have said what they were talking about in easier ways. These ways would be more straight forward and without all the "bullshit" added in. Even in the text, there were parts where they discuss how the writers of academic discourse use jargon that the average reader will most likely not understand or feel like the aren't smart enough to understand. I have read things like that where I feel like I shut down because I don't know what the material is trying to tell me.
"A Kind Word for Bullshit" did in the end take a better stance to bullshit than in the book "On Bullshit," but to me... it was all just a bunch of bullshit.
When reading the text, "A Kind Word for Bullshit," I couldn't relate to much of what the authors were saying. I could barely even understand what they were trying to say, until I came to this quote. I believe myself to not be a specialist of any kind in academic studies. I'm not majoring in any science fields and I do not plan to be a doctor one day. Although there are many other fields that use academic discourse, I still don't feel like I specialize in any of them. Therefore, I consider myself a non-academic, as referred to in the text.
As a non-academic, when reading a case study or an important document, I always think of ways they could have said what they were talking about in easier ways. These ways would be more straight forward and without all the "bullshit" added in. Even in the text, there were parts where they discuss how the writers of academic discourse use jargon that the average reader will most likely not understand or feel like the aren't smart enough to understand. I have read things like that where I feel like I shut down because I don't know what the material is trying to tell me.
"A Kind Word for Bullshit" did in the end take a better stance to bullshit than in the book "On Bullshit," but to me... it was all just a bunch of bullshit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
